News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Wheat deregulation working: AGEA 

Wheat deregulation working: AGEA

21 Apr, 2009 11:48 AM
THE Australian Grain Exporters Association has hailed the first year of deregulated wheat marketing as a success, in spite of logistical issues that have placed pressure on port facilities.

The lobby group, representing grain marketers such as Cargill and Louis Dreyfus, was a strong critic of the single desk export system and pushed hard for deregulation of the wheat marketing arrangement.

Robert Green, AGEA president, claimed deregulation had seen a number of accomplishments and advancements within the industry, and that participants had reacted favourably to the changes.

"Contrary to some reports, the huge nation-wide process of harvest, transport, storage, handling and marketing has worked extremely well," Mr Green said.

"Very large volumes of wheat have been shipped by both bulk and container freight since harvest."

Since the beginning of harvest, Wheat Exports Australia reports that more than 5.2 million tonnes of bulk wheat has been exported by 15 accredited exporters to 35 countries.

Mr Green said this logistical effort was a testament to the industry's ability to manage grain marketing and exports in a deregulated environment.

He poured scorn on the argument that the deregulation of the industry had a destabilising effect due to instability in the supply chain.

According to Mr Green, Australian wheat is in strong demand globally and growers now have more flexible access to a selection of accredited buyers, offering a variety of marketing options.

However, single desk crusader Jock Munro, Rankin Springs, NSW, said he had been in touch with international customers who said they had used diplomatic channels to notify our government of Australia's inability to supply wheat on time and their decision to source grain from other nations which could, including Canada and the USA.

But Mr Green, while acknowledging the logistical problems that have plagued the ports said the Australian market was now more functional and transparent than when AWB ran the single desk.

"Grain price movements reflect international and local market conditions which in turn are influenced by supply and demand trends," he said.

"It's a case of transparency and clear market signals, and the trade having systems in place to manage market risk."

He said exporters were prepared and ready for deregulation, though the transport task to service the excellent demand for Australian wheat had been underestimated.

"While there may have been large ship queues and long delays which highlight a need for logistical changes and infrastructure investment, the grain has been efficiently accumulated and marketed, and payments have flowed smoothly."

The spotlight has been on WA, due to the drought on the eastern seaboard last year.

"The fact that the CBH Group shipped a record monthly tonnage of 1.54 million tonnes of grain in March 2009 demonstrates that the deregulated marketing system is working successfully," Mr Green said.

"However, in spite of this, many exporters have experienced long delays and incurred considerable costs so we still have a lot of work to do on the inland supply chain."

To date, WA has exported 5.04 million tonnes of grain from the total 12.3 million tonne 2008-09 WA grain crop, and is likely to export record tonnages through to the end of August.

"Even so, it is important that there is a long-term shipping allocation system across the nation, and exporters will participate in the process to find the solution. Industry can and will work this out as we develop a stronger, more efficient and competitive wheat export industry," Mr Green said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
There is a slight westerly breeze in the air tonight but if you listen very carefully you can hear a lone man out side, howling at the moon.. I think it's coming from over ye-onder Griffith way? Has this man just got home to read the news articles posted on The Land web site today? Yes that’s right NEWS, no hype, no spin but a factual report that the all new deregulated and transparent industry is a success. (Is The Land allowed to publish positive stories?) No one can deny the teething problems at port and know one would argue that GrainCorp needs to improve a lot in order to keep up, but many of these problems were present under the mighty monopoly! For some reason big demurrage bills just didn’t make the news back then?
Posted by Free World, 21/04/2009 3:09:57 PM
Of course they would say these things. Hold a poll of growers to get their views of year one, and let's see what growers say. My experience has been flat pricing, lacklustre demand from traders, and in some instances a total lack of interest from traders to even bid on wheat. If the AGEA are fair dinkum, let's have the re-introduction of a quality payment system based on increments to reward and direct growers, instead of the return of flat pricing and no information flow to growers.
Posted by cannona, 21/04/2009 4:58:17 PM
Removing the desk never had anything to do with marketing wheat; it was always all about transferring wealth from growers to international grain traders, the big bullies in the industry, so I guess Green would have to call its removal a success. He won't, of course, mention the hundreds of millions of dollars denied to growers because of harvest time discounting and a lack of forward selling done on growers' behalf at the beginning of last year.
Posted by Ken, 21/04/2009 6:47:13 PM
Of coarse the traders are claiming success they have made a fortune at growers' expense. All the demurrage costs for shipping delays will be passed onto growers just like the massive increase in freight rail cost for shipping our grain to port. As well as traders paying below world parity price for grain and pocketing the rest. The bottles of expensive bubbly will be popping in their board rooms. I suspect most growers do not realise just what level of losses they have suffered under KRudd's new world order of marketing. The Labor Liberal coalition that passed this disasterous legislation should hanging their heads in shame.
Posted by Barely surviving, 22/04/2009 6:15:24 AM
AGEA's spin is an indication of what growers will be up against when they begin to repair the industry and regain some equity in the market place. Rest assured that Cargil, Dreyfuis and co will be lobbying our politicians at this very moment and will spend time and huge amounts of money in protecting their positions. It will not be easy to recapture our position or regain some control and plenty of determination and grit will be required.
Posted by Wheat Fields., 22/04/2009 8:41:15 AM
Hey, 'Free world', the one you refer to has many more supporters than those who are happy with your new world order.

The only problem is KRudd and his mates no longer support democracy which, if allowed to have gone to a vote, would have seen a new orderly (wheat) marketing system in place that returned the profits to growers not to your friends, the traders.

Be serious for a minute: who deserves to retain the profit - those who risk all to grow the wheat or those who risk little to trade it?

Who is howling at the moon now?

Posted by Barely surviving, 22/04/2009 8:16:11 PM
I agree with the last five comments.
Posted by R Steel, 23/04/2009 8:13:34 PM
Hey Mr Barely Surviving, you have a short memory. Under the old monopoly the National Pool used to incur a lot of demurrage when AWB messed up their sales program and guess what? Lots of growers on the East Coast that had opportunities to sell in the cash market would avoid dealing with AWB and South Australia and WA growers would foot the bill to run the AWB structure. Sound familiar? No wonder you did not want farmers across Australia to have choice.

And what is this rubbish about the cause of increases in freight costs. There has been an under investment in branch rail lines across Australia by both sides of politics over the past 30 or 40 years, during a time when all aspects of the industry were regulated. Give it away!

Posted by damian capp, 29/04/2009 6:39:23 AM
How many of the whinging farmers here took the grain traders up on their $400/t offers for last harvest and up to 3 years out? I am guessing very few ... even when you were all price MAKERS you didn't know what a good price was. Stop whinging and start learning to market your grain. Knowing a good price is the first thing you need to learn ... Honestly the bleeding heart routine is childish. You're just lucky there is a high likelihood of good prices returning for this coming harvest. My bet is many are now whinging about high fertiliser prices ... ever though about buying Incitec Pivot shares?
Posted by Nuffield, 4/05/2009 8:43:19 PM
Spot on Nuffield Scholar! Sadly the industry that we are all in is plagued by whinging farmers who don’t have the basic smarts to compare CBOT wheat prices (+/- a margin) in order to calculate a delivered farm gate or silo based price, and in lacking this basic skill the next easiest thing for them to do is to assume that they are all being ripped off and to assume that the single desk was such a good thing that looked after all farmers before shareholders (sadly in the end neither of which proved to be true!).

Barley Surviving - every once in a while you need to rotate your crops and also your views on the world or they both end up being plagued with rust and disease. “Who deserves to retain the profit?” Absolutely it is those who risk it all to grow the wheat, farming is never that simple though. In order to stay alive in cropping you need to be an agronomist and a trader, we don’t have the luxury of choosing which one or the other we are, we are both! If you are barely surviving, and strongly believe the large trading companies have it all sorted out, then the obvious thing to do would be to sell up and buy shares in one of these companies that are busy drowning themselves in expensive bubbly every night. Perhaps you could then change your screen name to, surviving, or perhaps even, thriving? Hey it's that easy perhaps we should all do it!

Posted by Free World, 5/05/2009 5:14:03 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Do you think tree changers generally have realistic expectations of rural life when they move to the bush?

Yes
(9.8%)

No
(89%)

Other
(1.2%)

Total Votes: 764
Poll Date: 19 April, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...