News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 BSE beef imports in the Senate's focus 

BSE beef imports in the Senate's focus

01 Feb, 2010 10:56 AM
GOVERNMENT guarantees of rigorous import assessments for all beef, which will soon be allowed into Australia from countries which have had bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), will go under the microscope at a second Senate inquiry into the controversial decision this week.

A Senate Committee on Rural and Regional Affairs will scrutinise the protocols for examining beef imports from countries which have had BSE, or mad cow disease, despite the Government's insistence that the risk of the decision to public health is "40 million times less than motor vehicle accidents".

Liberal Senator and quarantine critic, Bill Heffernan, said the next hearing will call for precise details on the assessment protocols for all beef destined for export for Australia from the countries in question.

It's his belief that there are no such protocols.

Minister for Trade, Simon Crean, said the Australian Government would ensure "the rigorous assurance process" so diseased source does not come into Australia.

He said the Government would insist that inspections were done "according to our standards" and not those dictated by other countries.

"…part of the reason for this change is the science has moved on significantly from the 80s and 90s … the expert that reviewed this has said that it is negligible risk because the science has moved on and the risk (to public health) is something like 40 million times less than risk from motorcar accidents," Mr Crean said.

In the first BSE imports Senate hearing, just prior to Christmas, industry representatives confirmed there was no detail yet on import protocols and those would not be developed until after the new import rules were operational, from March 1.

It was also acknowledged that the Government will have the final say on the protocols, despite the industry insisting full involvement in drawing up the new agreement.

Red Meat Advisory Council secretary, Justin Toohey, said while the beef industry peak bodies had given acceptance to the science behind the decision to allow the beef imports, the Government must prove those imports meet strict requirements.

"We are not saying … from March 1 let’s get flooded with imported beef," Mr Toohey told the December inquiry.

"We are saying that, from March 1, the policy changes — we acknowledge that, based on science — therefore we are internationally recognised as consistent.

"The government has to satisfy itself and we believe has to satisfy us that any tick of approval to trade has met very stringent guidelines."

Senator Heffernan said he accepted the science behind the decision also, but feared "human failure" would let Australia and its beef industry down.

Senator Heffernan said to have confidence in the beef industry leaders negotiating with the government, he wanted to see the details of the protocols devised between the industry and the government brought back to the committee before the new rules were implemented.

Mr Toohey said the beef industry's position was that if the government "is not satisfied that every single animal that is going to have beef from it sent here cannot be traced, then it is not to be brought in here".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
If there is one thing that you can be sure of is that you cannot trust this govt on anything they say especially on anything on a scientific basis at all, as can be seen from the whole climate change fiasco. If they say that it's safe to bring in beef based on their science, then you can be assured it is not. Who would believe one word this lot ever said? The string of lies that they have told on the so-called settled science of climate change beggers belief. So now we must all take the risk of getting the human version of mad cow disease from imported beef while they continue to kill farmers here that produce clean disease-free beef. When will the rot ever stop? When will the people ever revolt?
Posted by Loc Hey, 1/02/2010 1:55:38 PM, on The Land
Pork imports are subject to a 'rigorous assurance process' too, and imports have decimated that world class industry. This proposal will, in time, do the same for the domestic beef industry. Our governments are just not interested in the well being of primary industry. I fear that nothing short of food scarcity [hunger] will change this sorry situation!
Posted by 'Rob Roy', 2/02/2010 8:20:38 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Although it concerns me that the stated negiligable risk to human health would be near on impossible to achieve, the fact that a BSE outbreak would bring the beef industry here to its knees should be of major concern to our government. As a major export dollar earner for this nation, with a very bright exporting future, one wonders why they are willing to risk the viability of the whole industry? We need to get back to a govenment who is in touch with the people and the true needs of this country.
Posted by beef producer, 2/02/2010 8:39:26 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Heffernan should instead focus on fixing mistakes made when he was in Government (maybe walk outside Parliament House today for an idea or two). Or he could find a way to drop the dollar and make our prices increase and imports less likely. What is he doing about Reserve Bank's hikes that make our debt harder to pay and increases the dollar reducing farm income? I would want to eat beef even if there was a case of mad cow in Australia. The rules now allow that now there has been a change. Not a problem.
Posted by Skeptic, 2/02/2010 10:10:35 AM, on Queensland Country Life
If we have to mollify the Americans et al and have "free trade" blah blah we (consumers) want the beef labelled as coming from OVERSEAS at least. 1. To support our farmers 2. For our health. What is Australia getting out of the free trade deals? The Australian people have a right to know what meat is coming from BSE countries. Labelling in other words. So far we have not got anything like BSE - why play with some thing like this? We have plenty of our own beef growing in this country. We DON'T want to import problems unnecesarily. Why! Why! Why! do we have a hat in our hand for every country to come and use us a dumping ground and to rape our country of our natural resources and humbly thank them for same? It is time for the people of this country to wake up and think about how lucky we are and maintain what we have.
Posted by jayjay, 23/02/2010 3:33:53 PM, on Stock Journal
I can no longer donate blood or organs simply because I lived in the UK in 1994/95 and there are no tests available to confirm if a person has BSE, more commonly known as Mad Cow Disease. What if a BSE case were to appear in Australia after the Federal Government relaxes it's ban on beef imports? Would we then have no one in Australia who is able to donate blood and organs in order to save lives? We cannot import blood and organs from OS but we can stop possibly infected beef from coming to Australia.
Posted by Nicole, 27/02/2010 4:29:20 PM, on Stock & Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan.
Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
31 January, 2010
29 January, 2010
POLL
Q: What level of trust do you have in the claims made by environmental campaigners?

Total
(5%)

High
(12.7%)

Moderate
(6.2%)

Low
(21.3%)

None
(54.8%)

Total Votes: 1310
Poll Date: 31 January, 2010

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
Freedom Tanks
 
Small Farms Expo
 
Irwin HunterIrwin Hunter
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
WA Merino Magazine
 
FBG
 
photo gallery


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...