News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 Fear CSG could compromise cattle 

Fear CSG could compromise cattle

08 Feb, 2012 08:33 AM
FARMERS are concerned their livestock and produce could be barred from sale because of chemicals used in coal-seam gas drilling.

In a submission to the federal government about this year's budget, the National Farmers' Federation urged the government to accelerate assessment of the chemicals used in the coal-seam gas industry and in underground coal gasification, The Australian Financial Review reports.

The lobby group said the issue was becoming a legal headache for farmers, who are required by law to sign declarations vouching that their produce and livestock are free of certain chemicals.

"Farmers need to be assured that the chemicals that come into contact with commodities on their farms are suitable for contact with agricultural produce, and that the relevant withholding period has been enacted," the submission says.

Rosemary Nankivell, who farms 100km west of Tamworth and has campaigned against the expansion of the coal-seam gas industry, said it was not just a legal issue, but a financial one as farmers could not sell animals that might be contaminated.

Her concern was that the process of fracking, used to extract the gas, could contaminate water reserves that livestock rely on.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I believe that it is too simplistic to limit worries to fracking (stimulating as the industry would have us say now) , the product water alone contains so many toxic contaminents that will no doubt turn up in produce. So I would think the Government should be expected to develop a policy, sign and take all responsibility for a decision it has made to expose out land, water and produce to these toxins. I live on the Surat Basin and cannot imagine the toxic load all the flood water which is travelling through Qld, the NSW, then VIc, then SA will have on those downstream. Gigaliters of water.
Posted by Brian Monk, 8/02/2012 10:44:10 AM
Who will make good when these chemicals start turning up in the cattle? The companies? Not likely, it'll be up to the poor old farmer and the taxpayer to try and fix the damage if that even possible.


Posted by Frank, 8/02/2012 12:04:07 PM
I agree with Brian Monk. When you extract that amount of water - things are going to move around under the ground and who knows where they will turn up.

Exploration and Drilling for CSG should not be allowed to proceed until it can be proven that chemicals are not going to leach out of the coal seams into the underground aquifers or left behind by fracking

If it is still then allowed to proceed baseline testing of water levels and chemicals should be done on every existing bore on that basin - before a drill is allowed to touch the ground. Then at least we can prove issues caused by CSG

Posted by Sally Undery, 8/02/2012 4:27:12 PM
Visit Youtube to see what has been recently revealed showing 'Lord' Monkton with a group of mining executives- saying how media ownership and control will greatly aid the activities of this cut-throat industry. These dodgy vandals think they are untouchable, as our governments, our judicial system, and our laws have been too weak.
Posted by brett sanders, 8/02/2012 6:38:18 PM
More fear mongering from vested interests. This time the farm lobby.

Farmers already have very effective benzene delivery mechanisms under their control. They are know as farm machinery. Diesel engines deliver large amounts of Benzene. Not 100's of metres below the ground but directly into their breathed by cattle.

Before any rules are imposed there should be baseline testing. And farmers should be held to the same standards on all chemicals.

Posted by Rick, 9/02/2012 12:03:17 AM
I disagree with labelling farmers "vested interests" This denies existence of the enormous disparity in power between mining/CSG companies and farmers

Farmers are potentially affected STAKEHOLDERS, disempowered by processes for mining/CSG projects that may damage their livelihoods, land values & wellbeing

My experience is Regulatory process FAIL to properly protect water supplies & technical assessments can be slanted in favour of projects

Farmers & their experts MUST be empowered in assessments & decision making

This is a Social Justice issue

Posted by Heather, 9/02/2012 7:17:00 AM
Hello Rick, farmers are already held accountable for our actions including with chemicals its called Quality Assurance and we get audited every year and can have surprise audits at any time as well. If we dont comply we cant sell our products in our case milk. We have had baseline testing on our farm for chemicals we had no choice in it or what company did the testing, all this is part of our Quality Assurance system. These systems have given Australian farmers the edge in over seas markets because of our safe food policys.
Posted by Michael, 9/02/2012 7:35:30 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
27 January, 2012
01 February, 2012
04 February, 2012
POLL
Q: Should Cattle Council get a proportion of the $5 transaction levy to boost funding of its operations?

Yes
(13.2%)

No
(46.8%)

Only if Cattle Council starts doing more to represent the beef industry
(31.1%)

The government should provide additional funding
(8.9%)

Total Votes: 447
Poll Date: 06 February, 2012

Most popular articles


Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...