News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 Agriculture's future: value or volume? 

Agriculture's future: value or volume?

2/10/2008 11:58:00 AM
In light of increasing global concern about food security will agriculture secure its future by focussing on value or volume?

That will be one of the key questions debated at Australasia's major science and agribusiness conference to be held in Christchurch, New Zealand, last this month.

The fifth in the Horizons in Livestock Sciences conference series will be hosted by Australia's CSIRO Livestock industries and New Zealand's largest government research institute, AgResearch.

According to CLI chief Alan Bell, if the world is to maintain the same effective level of food supply in 2050 as there was in 2000, there will need to be a 50pc improvement in the world's agricultural productivity.

"While this doesn't seem like such a big ask, given that there has been a 400pc increase in food produced per hectare over the last 100 years, there are several complicating factors that will make this achievement much more challenging than it might appear," he said.

"One factor will be the stress that all human activity, including agriculture, puts on the environment.

"We must not only increase the volume of agricultural production to feed the world's human population but we must also do it in ways that substantially reduces the impact of agriculture on our environment.

"At the same time, if agriculture is to continue to make a significant contribution to Australian and New Zealand economies, we need to also produce food and textile products for which wealthy customers around the world are willing to pay premium prices."

Dr Bell says there is an argument that sustainably high returns can only be generated from products that are particularly valuable to customers, incorporate elements that are scarce and have attributes that are difficult for competitors to imitate.

"While some of our current agricultural products have these characteristics, many do not and there are calls for transition to producing higher-value foods and textiles than we do at present," he says.

* For full details about the conference go to: www.livestockhorizons.com.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The question is silly, for our own sake we have to produce better quality at an affordable price, there is absolutely no point and no gain in producing tonnes and tonnes of, say, tomatoes, that end up being picked green as grass and taste like cardboard refrigerated.......... for a few cents more we can produce enough of the stuff that actually TASTE good and is good!! We might even be able to exported to Italy to make "Picked Ripe Tomato Sauce!!"
Posted by peter on 3/10/2008 6:22:04 AM
No volume = no value = no reward.
Posted by THE FARMER on 3/10/2008 10:19:47 AM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Image source: CSIRO
Image source: CSIRO

Q: Do you believe there is a discernable difference in food quality between organic and non-organic farm produce?

Organic is superior
(55.7%)

There is no difference
(32.4%)

Conventional produce is superior
(11.8%)

Total Votes: 861
Poll Date: 29/09/2008

13/11/2008 | Cattle are getting a bad rap these days, so it's refreshing to see Britain's venerable National Trust getting into the business of "conservation cows".
Freedom Tanks
 
FW Subscriptions
 
Irwint HunterI
 
Rural Outlets
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Nextra Inks
 
Agrimaster
 
Rural Bookshop
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...