News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 Cattle producers not consulted on BSE decision 

Cattle producers not consulted on BSE decision

29 Oct, 2009 06:15 AM
"RANK and file" cattle producers were not consulted on the Government's surprise announcement last week lifting the ban on beef imports from BSE countries, according to Federal Senators, who won the right to scrutinise the moves in a special inquiry this week.

A request for an immediate inquiry into the decision to allow beef imports from countries which have had BSE or mad cow disease was approved this week amid concern about what the decision – which has been strongly supported by the majority of the beef industry lobby groups - will mean for Australia's clean green trading reputation.

While the Australian meat industry has been quick to respond to some of the concerns, the issue was still referred to a special inquiry within the Senate Rural and Regional Affairs committee.

Last week, the Government announced it would remove its blanket ban on the import of beef and beef products from countries which have been infected with BSE.

The government said there would be no risks to human health or trade, as a result and had acted because of industry lobbying to remove the ban.

The inquiry, given the nod on Tuesday, will investigate the possible impacts and consequences for public health, trade and agriculture of the government's decision to relax the import restrictions.

Greens Senator and deputy chair of the committee Christine Milne moved the motion, fearful the decision could have been influenced more by trade than quarantine.

"I want to make sure that the Government has not just caved in to WTO (World Trade Organisation) pressure, and that the assurances about trade and risk to Australia’s beef industry are robust," Senator Milne said.

Independent Senator Nick Xenophon and the Liberal's Bill Heffernan argue only the top levels of the cattle industry were part of the discussions surrounding the decision and most farmers would not understand or agree with the decision.

Senator Xenophon said he backed the call for an inquiry because he believed most beef producers would oppose the new rules.

"I think you'll find that rank and file cattle operators around the country aren't happy with this," Senator Xenophon said this week.

"They are concerned about the implications and it seems that a deal has been done without proper consultation, without due consultation.

"And that's why you need a Senate inquiry, an urgent Senate inquiry, to get to the bottom of this very quickly."

Senator Heffernan said the industry could still avoid a forced "off-the-shelves" situation if it introduced a mandatory SRM (specified risk materials) removal for all slaughtered cattle.

He said instead the recent decision only lowers Australia's import and biosecurity standards.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Our govt doesnt give #@+_ F about beef producers! What is the MLA, the PGA, the NFF and so on doing about this? Nothing.
Posted by shaun, 29/10/2009 10:29:40 AM
Governments do not give a rats about everyday working Australians, especially those in any form of agriculture. Read: http://www.maff.gov.au/media/medi a_releases/2009/october/australia _refines_its_food_safety_rules_fo r_imported_beef_and_beef_products

Where are the consultations that were held to back this decision?? Put their names to paper so they do not remain faceless . . .

Posted by Exactly, 29/10/2009 1:55:12 PM
I think it might be time all cattle produces go on strike, no amimals to slaughter at all. Let them eat lettuce leaves and mad cows!!
Posted by hey loc, 29/10/2009 6:11:44 PM
Where do we find so many morons. This decision must have been made in Washington. It makes no sense for Australia. First GM now Mad Cow. What are these idiots on about?

We used to think of ourselves as the clever country. We are now the laughing stock of the world and the butt hole of nothing. There is no chance, Exactly, for these people to be named, their credibility in the community would be zero.

Posted by denis, 30/10/2009 3:02:40 AM
Canada and the USA were free to export to Australia prior to their incidents of BSE. After BSE, Australia introduced a rule that said "no beef shall be sold in Australia that comes from a country with a case of BSE". The consequence of this is that if Australia had a case, we could not sell beef!

This issue has been around for years, and our politicians have beaten it up into something bigger than Ben Hur. We rely on export markets to survive - we therefore need international rules that are science based - otherwise we would be shut out of every market for political reasons.

Any country trying to export beef into Australia will be dealt with on a case by case basis, as they were prior to BSE.

How much came in then? Very little- less than 100 tonnes per year. How much beef do we send the other way - hundreds of thousands of tonnes! Footnote: If any producer wants to have a say, get involved with your farmer organisation.

Posted by Practical Farmer, 30/10/2009 5:49:55 AM
Beef producers are doing it hard enough with high expenditure costs, hard work and not enough rising income for their product...yes we are p@#!#d off beef producers, if anyone is asking, Mr Rudd!!!
Posted by annoyed, 30/10/2009 6:00:40 AM
Just refering to Shaun's comments, all of these organisations get a lot of their funding from government, in other words they have to kiss the goverments backside, otherwise Minister Burke would not be passing policies in favour of them.

These producer groups do not represent the views of farmers anymore, they are only there for their own benefits.

I do like the idea, though, of farmers going on strike. Starve the hell out of the nation and then see if we get paid the respect that we deserve!!

Posted by Farm girl, 30/10/2009 7:10:08 AM
I was under the mistaken understanding that the local member represented the constituent view to Government.....

These lobby groups and the process of lobbying needs a broom treatment. The lower house is for the people not big business lobbying a commercial interest....

The first question that needs an answer is: Why do we need to import beef or pork or lamb or any other meat into Australia?

Posted by pepper, 30/10/2009 7:37:28 AM
Pepper, we dont need it, the agenda is to destroy the west's economy. Then we will see a world govt come in. And Australians will do what there told when there told... or else. Time is running out.
Posted by Loc Hey, 30/10/2009 12:32:51 PM
All those farmers threatening to go on strike, I dare you to do it! Truth is, though, you won't because you need the consumer more than the consumer needs you. Fact of life! Suck it up and adapt...
Posted by Annoyed Youth, 1/11/2009 1:50:08 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
26 October, 2009
27 October, 2009
28 October, 2009
POLL
Q: For what level of cattle transaction levy will you be voting at this year's Meat and Livestock Australia annual general meeting?

$3.50
(64.9%)

$5
(35.1%)

Total Votes: 276
Poll Date: 25 October, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...