News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 MLA counter punches with live-ex ad of its own 

MLA counter punches with live-ex ad of its own

29 Oct, 2008 07:28 AM
Meat and Livestock Australia is countering the latest advertising campaign by Animals Australia, taking its own full page advertisements in a rural newspapers in support of the live export trade.

Animals Australia has taken full page ads in three rural newspapers this week, which feature an open letter to livestock producers urging them not to send stock by the boat trade to the Middle East for the upcoming Festival of the Sacrifice (Eid Al Adha).

Countering this is an open letter from MLA, in which its manager of livestock services for the Middle East & Africa, Peter Dundon, writes that producers and the livestock industry find cruelty to animals unacceptable.

And he says the industry is investing heavily to change the practices in question in the Middle East.

"I can assure you the Australian livestock export industry, including exporters, producers and the farming families and communities that invest in animal welfare, find any cruelty to animals unacceptable and we continue to work hard to deliver even further improvements in the countries we export animals to," Mr Dundon writes.

"Living 15km from the feedlot and working there on a regular basis, I can advise that Bahrain Livestock Company Feedlot has good yards and loading facilities and that on six days of the week; 47 weeks per year, around 1700 sheep/day are quietly walked onto a single deck semi-trailer and transported the three minute journey to the abattoir that's less than 2km from the feedlot."

Mr Dondon said that figure rises to around 3000 sheep/day during Ramadan, when local consumption roughly doubles.

"They are also handled and transported properly," he said.

"Over 99pc of sheep from Bahrain feedlot are handled and transported out of Bahrain feedlot each year in what we would all consider as being acceptable conditions; no different from walking sheep onto a truck at a farm, saleyard or feedlot in Australia.

"There's no yelling, hitting, dragging, throwing and the good design of the loading facilities makes the process quite easy and stress free."

But during the Festival of the Sacrifice, Mr Dundon said the normal loading process changes as people require live animals.

"So they are sold as private sales and do not go directly to the abattoir in the company's truck," he said.

"This period continues to present the greatest logistical and handling challenge of the year for many operators.

"This is due to the magnitude and nature of the demand for live animals that differs from normal through this three-day period.

"Myself and our team of animal welfare experts, based in the region, are working hard to improve handling and infrastructure as well as the purchasing/selling and distribution system, but in reality, for this particular time of the year it is challenging.

"There are literally thousands of people wanting to purchase live animals and we're the first to admit that making change through this period is difficult.

"What is presented on television should be considered in relation to the remaining 362 days of the year when these poor practices are rare and the pressure to deliver sheep to individual purchasers is far less."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
You Animal Libbos seem to have gone quiet on this report, it seems. They should open the other eye and have a look.
Posted by Sam, 29/10/2008 6:31:58 PM
365 days of the year, livestock should be treated in ways equal to Australian Standards.
Posted by MJM, 30/10/2008 4:34:11 AM
There is no way Australian standards can be monitored or maintained in a foreign country.

The "good yards" and "loading facilities" don't protect the animals! If they are taken home for slaughter, what is to protect the sheep from rusty knives and amateur killers? There a no laws to protect animals in these countries.

Farmers always say they care for their animals, but this trade contradicts it.

We need to move away from livestock industries anyway if we are serious about climate change. The land, air and ocean pollution from sheep is adding to climate change and environmental destruction.

Posted by Vivienne, 30/10/2008 5:08:26 AM
I find it interesting that we choose to ignore the number of 'home kills' and backyard butchers right here in our own country.
Posted by tosca, 30/10/2008 6:05:50 AM
Just wondering why you are all still over here whinging about the standards that the sheep go through when they are exported. Why don't all the animal liberationists traipse off to the middle east and tell them all how they should be doing it. Vivienne, do you know anything about livestock production systems and the amount of money they bring to the Australian economy annually and how much this effects your standard of living? It's great to be able to sit in your ivory tower and tell everyone how it should be run but all I see is your posts on here. What are you actively doing to change the situation? At least MLA has people on the ground in the middle east actually TRYING to make a difference. Livestock production in Australia will never cease. This country was founded on livestock and it is our number one goal to develop and maintain the consistent quality of our products. Climate change my foot, get a grip and stop hanging on to flimsy arguments. The farmers will be taxed for it eventually, because people like you won't let up until you see that it is no longer a viable industry. Thanks for maintaining your lifetime goal of ruining Australia's lifestyle.
Posted by JL, 30/10/2008 7:35:32 AM
Memo to MLA: Give up on the Viviennes of the world, let them starve. The real target audience is not them, nor the majority of readers of rural newspapers.

The real target audience is the passive, unquestioning majority of urban dwellers who are easily impressed by the authoritative voices of the articulate pseudo-scientists that influence politicians' decisions, like buying Toorale Station.

Get a serious perception-management counter-strategy going - that's what you're up against, not just PR.

Posted by AJ, 30/10/2008 8:13:32 AM
Farmers say they don't want to see their animals treated poorly. The reality is though that the live export trade to the Middle East, in particular, inflicts an extreme level of cruelty on a huge number of animals year round - and any measures taken in the region to redress this are "drop in the ocean" stuff. Let's not kid ourselves here.

There is a solution - government commitment to gradually phase out the industry and support farmers involved as they move to more humane areas of the livestock industry.

Then we'd have more processing jobs kept in Australia, better for our economy and better for our animals.

Takes a long-term outlook though, and that's where progress on this issue always comes unstuck.

Posted by JB, 30/10/2008 8:31:51 AM
So JL from what you have written it seems that economics justifies animal cruelty? It appears that you are the one "hanging on to flimsy arguments".

Already there are Australian farmers who have their livestock slaughtered halal here and send chilled carcasses to the Middle East.

As for livestocks impact on climate change, check out the United Nations report "Livestock's Long Shadow". Perhaps you need to educate yourself a little before you further criticise people who are doing nothing more than trying to protect the voiceless animals from a cruel and unnecessary fate.

Posted by Sally, 30/10/2008 9:08:38 AM
A total waste of money by MLA, advertising in rural papers. It is the urban audience that needs to be convinced about live exports, but the MLA has no idea how to do that. The railers against live exports tend to be the same people most upset about any racism and claiming to cherish cultural diversity - they need to be made aware that the latter is a package deal that includes home slaughter for Id.
Posted by b.rational, 30/10/2008 9:41:49 AM
As my shearing contractor says "if you're the owner of live stock you will also be the owner of dead stock". Toughen up you wimps. Every year i have to dispose of the cancerous, the lame & infirm, the badly flystruck. Sheep are able to find new & strange ways to die. The death rates on the boats would be below most large scale farms. JB are you tough enough to work in a ab? If you want more abs built are you prepared to live next to one or are you a nimby?
Posted by THE FARMER, 30/10/2008 10:15:02 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
MLA's livestock services manager for the Middle East, Peter Dundon.
MLA's livestock services manager for the Middle East, Peter Dundon.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should there be mandatory labelling laws to advise consumers if food contains ingredients from genetically modified (GM) crops?

Yes
(86.9%)

No
(11.1%)

Undecided
(1.9%)

Total Votes: 1507
Poll Date: 27 October, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...