News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Angry grower response to first AWI mulesing forum 

Angry grower response to first AWI mulesing forum

09 Jul, 2008 01:05 PM
Australian Wool Innovation board member, Chris Abell, has made it clear to wool producers the research company was not part of the decision to phase out mulesing.

Dr Abell was forced to defend the wool organisation at AWI's The Road to 2010 meeting in Katanning, WA, as several hecklers continued to express anger at the decision and the lack of opportunity for the public to have their views aired and responded to by AWI.

Supporting the AWI position, Pastoralists and Graziers Association wool section president, Digby Stretch, said it was an unpalatable decision, but it was made with the best people at the time who had been elected by wool producers.

Various organisations have tried to distance themselves from the decision but remain publicly united in their commitment to support research and development of better mulesing alternatives.

Others, including several WA Stud Merino Breeders Association members, support the decision but have said they will continue to mules until an alternative is available, even after the deadline.

Dudinin Merino breeder, David Webster, said his family had made an economic decision to keep mulesing based on the lack of time and a cost-efficient alternative.

Those opposed to the mulesing phase out have rejected the AWI's suite of non-mulesing opportunities to soon be made commercially available, including breech clips, intradermal and breeding solutions.

Highbury wool producer Jean McGregor was vocal in her opposition.

She said there was no viable or cost effective alternative that further enhanced the welfare of sheep, other than mulesing.

"Pain relief is just a token measure," she said.

* Extract from a full report in Farm Weekly, WA, July 10 issue.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
If at this AWI meeting they are still talking about intradermal injections, why is it so that at a meeting about pain relief and mulesing 2 months ago we were told that the intradermal injection had been shelved due to a link with mad cow disease???
Posted by Marc, 9/07/2008 3:33:56 PM
Bought some bare breech rams last September. I've had half my average rainfall in the last 12 months, and the only flyblown sheep I've had have been those bloody rams!
Posted by Brindi, 9/07/2008 5:14:10 PM
This mulesing debate will continue until science catches up with the demands now placed on the industry as a result of an ill-informed extremist group's propoganda.

It is a clear example of a non-issue being turned into one, as result of a miniscule miniority group misinforming the public and should be a warning to all primary industry producer and leaders, that when the likes of PETA (or any other such extremist fringe group) stick their heads up in future and mislead or lie to the public on any issue, that an educational response is immediately forthcoming from the targetted industry.

I challenge and call upon all PETA members (who claim to be so outraged by mulesing) to donate their money to scientific research, instead of demonstrating and funding activities which are damaging the sheep industry. Doing so would solve the problem sooner, would be lead to a solution to the problem much sooner and also would prove that your motives truly were centred around animal welfare and not simply away of donating money to a cause to make you feel good about youself. Hold PETA accountable for the way it spends your donations, or donate elsewhere!!

The fact remains that mulesing is currently the most cost effective and efficient way of preventing fly blown sheep. The sheep industry need to go on the offensive and counter PETA on this sole point.

Posted by CQ, 10/07/2008 6:12:07 AM
I have posted comments before...the anti-mulesing lobby is basically ill informed, and has the 'issue' completely out of perspective.......before the drought, I ran 25,000, mainly superfine merino sheep......obviously, at a cost, we can jet the sheep every week..........I would have to use a transportable system, because I cannot drive the sheep that far every week..........but are there not about 25,000 other 'issues' that we should be dealing with first!!!...............should I list them for your readers?
Posted by Sanders frith-brown, 10/07/2008 7:05:23 AM
The date of 2010 was set on the basis of a promise by AWI that they would have an alternative ready by then. For Dr Abell to be saying now that AWI had nothing to do with the decision seems somewhat disingenuous.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 10/07/2008 9:00:55 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: How do you rate the effectiveness of the current exceptional circumstances drought assistance program?

Excellent
(8.1%)

Good
(17.2%)

Average
(17.7%)

Poor
(24.7%)

Terrible
(32.3%)

Total Votes: 344
Poll Date: 06 July, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...