News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 New flystrike treatments leave no open wound: AWI 

New flystrike treatments leave no open wound: AWI

8/09/2008 11:51:00 AM
New technologies designed to combat flystrike in Merino lambs are painless and leave no open wound, according to Australian Wool Innovation.

Further information on the two new treatments was released today by AWI chairman, Brian van Rooyen, who announced AWI's development of these technologies in August.

"With the working titles of FST–1 and FST–2, the chemicals act in different ways," Mr van Rooyen said.

"One is a gel that when injected forms a barrier between the sheep's skin and its flesh, eventually leading to that patch of skin contracting and an overall tightening of the breech area without an open wound.

"The second chemical forms an internal suture which leads to skin being painlessly removed without an open wound."

He said that in both cases the area treated sufficiently enlarges the bare breech area and also removes the breech wrinkle of the Merino genotypes, which have been tested so far.

However, Mr van Rooyen said that AWI was not ready to provide more information on the identity of the FST–1 and FST–2 chemicals because necessary patent processes were yet to be finalised.

"New trials on these chemicals will commence at SARDI by the end of September under Animal Ethics Committee approval and APVMA permit PER 7250," he said.

"More information will be made available when AWI has something substantial further to report."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Congratulations AWI and the people responsible for the developement of this technology. This may provide woolgrowers with another product to keep our sheep safe from flystrike and retain our credibility with retailers around the world.
Posted by Bullant on 9/09/2008 9:10:50 AM
Yep. That's just what we need - more chemicals in the system to promote a 'clean green' image. Can't wait to see what the mums at Woolies think about buying lamb that has been injected with skin rotting chemicals.
Posted by woolly on 9/09/2008 9:13:14 AM
The comment from "woolly" is totally ridiculous and only adds fuel to the wool producers who think we should ignore PETA and others as it looks like their only agenda seems to be to bring about the end of the Australian Wool Industry. AWI (and anyone else with constructive ideas) should be congratulated, encouraged and given credit for any possible solution brought forward to resolve this issue. If "woolly" would like to be part of the solution, then let's hear some constructive ideas, if not then get out of the way and stop the silly negative comments.
Posted by RH on 9/09/2008 9:53:35 AM
I agree with woolly. The less chemicals the better, but one more onto the list that we already use cannot be that catastrophic. When it comes down to it, if the market wants organic sheep, they will get it.
Posted by Tony on 9/09/2008 11:33:42 AM
This is a great innovation. Woolly shows his/her ignorance of the industry as this treatment would be used for ewes and wethers being retained for breeding and wool production and certainly wouldn't be used on lambs being sold for slaughter. Woolly needs to get the wool out of his eyes. Maybe a good crutching would fix him.
Posted by dave the cricket on 9/09/2008 12:25:44 PM
Well Done AWI. Keep up the good work. When this is shown to work, no doubt Wal and Chick and Martin will all issue a public apology for their PETA loving activities?
Posted by Sir George on 9/09/2008 1:15:00 PM
I think this is a great innovation also, and given how mulesing is on the way out, we need a quick and effective way to control the problem of flystrike. Given that this is a painless exercise, I daresay that it fits the bill for animal welfare adequately, and as for it being "just what we need - more chemicals in the system to promote a 'clean green' image." Woolly, I think that you are laboring under the impression that they are going to put it into circulation, regardless of any ill effects to humans. Your so called Clean Green image only exists where consumers want it to, mainly in the cities, and so yes, as Tony pointed out, there will always be organic sheep for those who want it, but at a price.

Dave the Cricket brings up the most valid point, not every sheep needs to have this type of procedure, whether it be mulesing or a chemical treatment, as most meat sheep don't live long enough to need this sort of thing done. Let's cut the waffle, it's better than slicing a piece of skin off and it is going to save the sheep from having a punt load of maggots in their fleece, something that I would consider to be a greater welfare issue than one injection.

RH is right, let's all encourage people who are trying to make a difference and please both ends of the issue; the producers and the animal activists. Good on you AWI.

Posted by JL on 9/09/2008 3:46:46 PM
I cannot believe the naivety of some of the commentators of this article. Congratulating AWI is ignorantly misguided. Make no mistake - the chemical was developed by one or more talented and innovative persons who were funded by woolgrower levies. AWI were merely the conduit for the funding. By the way, Woolly's point cannot be ignored.
Posted by Bob on 9/09/2008 4:12:37 PM
Hold on a minute, everyone read the article. They haven't even trialled these new silver bullets. Once again woolgrowers are being caught by the political spin being put out by AWI so they can save face and divert your attention away from the millions of dollars they have wasted on research projects. This has nothing to do with a mulesing alternative or peta but everthing to do with the AWI directors and the chairman who are up for realection soon keeping power. everyone just stop, take a breath and bingo you will see this for what it is: spin, spin, spin.

If it wasn't spin why would any research company with any level of credabillity release information without it being peered reviewed? Woolgrowers must stop this rot, it is time for a change.

Posted by time for a change on 9/09/2008 5:28:48 PM
Congratulations AWI and the research teams behind this development. I wonder if "woolly" understands what is sprayed on her/his brocolli before it reaches the shelves at Woolies. Maybe he/she doen't eat vegetables either??
Posted by Trevor on 9/09/2008 8:58:29 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
AWI chairman Brian van Rooyen.
AWI chairman Brian van Rooyen.

RELATED ARTICLES

Q: If a Federal election was held next weekend, for which party would you vote?

Labor
(12.2%)

Liberal
(38.2%)

Nationals
(27.5%)

Greens
(8.6%)

Family First
(1.7%)

Independent
(7.3%)

Undecided/Other
(4.5%)

Total Votes: 1040
Poll Date: 07 Sep 08

MOST POPULAR

01 Jul 09 | The ridiculous ironies and double standards of both politicians and the media were on show for all to see with the ‘utegate’ scandal, online editor Michael Thomson writes, but he says no-one is the better for it.
Ray White Rural
 
Freedom Tanks
 
Irwin HunterIrwin Hunter
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
FOL Email Promo


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...