News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Olsson censured for misleading AWI board 

Olsson censured for misleading AWI board

29 Oct, 2008 10:01 AM
Controversial Australian Wool Innovation board member, Chick Olsson, has been officially censured by seven of his fellow directors for allegedly trying to "mislead and deceive" them.

Mr Olsson and another board member, Wal Merriman, a leading NSW finewool Merino breeder, did not attend the meeting.

The Olsson censure resolution read: "The board resolved that it deplores the behaviour of director (Chick) Olsson in misleading and deceiving the board in relation to the comments he made to the Bendigo Advertiser published on September 9, 2008, and by subsequently denying he made those comments at board meetings held on September 18 and October 16, 2008. The board considers this as a serious breach of trust by director Olsson. The board resolved to publicly release this censure resolution."

The motion was supported by the chairman, Brian van Rooyen, and directors, Chris Abell, Kevin Bell, Ken Boundy, Robyn Clubb, Roger Fletcher and John Keniry.

The AWI cannot force Mr Olsson to resign (not without a potentially messy battle) but Mr van Rooyen said most directors faced with a similar situation would "fall on their sword".

At the centre of the row was an article in the Bendigo Advertiser on September 9 which quoted Mr Olsson as follows: "He, van Rooyen, must stand down immediately (as chairman of AWI). And if he does not I will call for him to resign at a board meeting next week. He has called into question the integrity of the board members and imagine how this is viewed by our trading partners."

Mr van Rooyen said Mr Olsson had denied at an AWI board meeting on September 18 that he had made the statements and agreed to seek a retraction from the Bendigo Advertiser.

On October 22 the editor of the Bendigo Advertiser told AWI in writing that the newspaper stood fully by the article.

Mr Olsson was elected to the AWI board in November last year against the wishes of the then chairman, Ian McLachlan, who stepped aside in April and was replaced by his deputy, Brian van Rooyen.

* More on the in-fighting in the wool industry in this week's Rural Press agricultural newspapers.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So you can mislead and deceive the Board of a major company - and still stay on this board? In any other company, he'd be out the door is 5 seconds! And to paraphrase a famous book - "Where was Wally?" Yet, I fear, people will still vote for the AWGA candidates.
Posted by Sir George, 29/10/2008 11:46:59 AM
Are we really trying to promote wool on the international stage with this lot of incompetents running the industry?????
Posted by jerangle, 30/10/2008 5:35:48 AM
Let's hope the AWGA board takeover doesn't happen because if we think things look bad now, who knows what will happen with them in charge. Collectively Olsson, Fletcher and Wally's behaviour only damages our industry and makes us look like fools. If AWGA does get up, I will raise my glass and offer a toast to the end of my wool business.
Posted by Winston, 30/10/2008 5:40:56 AM
What is the difference between Chick Olsson and Sir George? Give up? Well, for good or bad we know who Chick Olsson is. All we know about Sir George is that he doesn't have the courage to tell us who he is. The courage of his convictions are so strong that he has to hide behind a silly name. A Peer of the Realm maybe.
Posted by Roger Crook, 30/10/2008 6:43:27 AM
For the record, Sir George, I think you should have nominated for the AWI board as a regal appointee. Ignore these AWGA sympathisers and continue your criticism.


Posted by Winston C, 30/10/2008 11:48:33 AM
The latest fax received from the incumbents demonstates why Fletcher, Olsson and Merriman are isloated on the board.

Van Rooyen & Co's attack on Modiano & Fletcher (who between them have millions invested in the industry) is insulting.

The 2010 phase out of mulesing is threatening the real core of this industry. The only reason they are sticking their neck out is to try and save the industry, not to pick up the $65,000 a year directors' fee.

I would think they would rather focus on making a quid, instead of being insulted.

Posted by Alex Nicholson, 30/10/2008 1:14:10 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Chick Olsson
Chick Olsson
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should there be mandatory labelling laws to advise consumers if food contains ingredients from genetically modified (GM) crops?

Yes
(86.9%)

No
(11.1%)

Undecided
(1.9%)

Total Votes: 1507
Poll Date: 27 October, 2008

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...