News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 GM research facility unveiled for Merredin 

GM research facility unveiled for Merredin

03 Aug, 2010 09:53 AM
THE State Government has this week detailed two crop research and development facilities, one with a distinct focus on genetically modified organisms, to be established at Merredin.

The "New Genes for New Environments" facility will provide a controlled testing envirmonment to enable the grains industry to evaluate growth and yield characteristics of genetically modified traits.

The second is a Managed Environment Facility (MEF) for specialised research on non-GM crops.

Both facilities will be based at the Department of Agriculture and Food’s Merredin research station.

Minister for Agriculture and Food Terry Redman said both facilities would seek out improvements for grain production under the effects of drought, heat and frost.

“These facilities will play a vital role in evaluating new genes and breeding lines, sourced through national and global partnerships, and adapting them to local conditions," he said.

“It is apparent that dry seasons like the one we’re currently experiencing will become more common. However, I’m confident that with the right tools, such as the crops that will be developed in these facilities, the grains industry in WA can continue to thrive.”

The "New Genes for New Environments" facility is part of a $9million project announced in the State Budget, and along with another facility at Katanning, will evaluate GM canola, wheat, barley and lupins, Mr Redman said.

“A key stepping stone in GM crop development is the stage where materials make their first transition from the laboratory bench and glasshouse, out into the field in the real agricultural environment. This site will allow that to happen under containment arrangements that meet national gene technology regulations.”

Mr Redman said trials to be evaluated over time could include key features required for future adaptation and productivity such as drought tolerance, nutrient use efficiency, disease resistance, grain quality traits and reduced susceptibility to frost.

The Managed Environment Facility, one of three MEFs being established in Australia, is a joint investment by the department and the Grains Research and Development Corporation.

It will facilitate research into crop yield and quality improvements, with a focus on identifying non-GM adaptive traits and farm management strategies.

Rain exclusion shelters and irrigation treatments at the MEFs will be used to control conditions and induce or relieve drought in ways typical of WA drought-prone environments.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr Redman, what a deplorable waste of tax payers funds. You should study the words of Professor of Agronomy at Guelph University ,Dr E. Ann Clark who has written a piece “Let the World Learn from our Experience” . In this she describes the devastating results of GM canola's introduction into her country. Having waited in vane for 30 years for the oft promised frost tolerant tomatoes or alt tolerant strawberries in vane, she has become appalled at the scandalous waste of billions of dollars on GM research. She describes GE as a spectacular failure and a black hole which swallows up funding and diverts it away from the more successful breeding programmes (such as selective breeding in conjunction with gene mapping) Lets face facts, agribusiness has cleared and salted up the land, used fuel, fertilizers and pesticides which destabilised the climate and killed off soil microbes that oxidize atmospheric methane and others that store carbon in the soil. There is one system of agriculture which can turn things around and start us on a road to healthy abundance and a safe climate. Its called organic. Fund that for a change instead of GM .
Posted by Merri Bee, 3/08/2010 5:00:25 PM, on Farm Weekly
GM is a technology that doesn't work as it is scientifically wrong. Genes are not masters that direct everything, they work in complex ways with one another and the environment. The reason the government and some scientists have to cling on to the old ideas is that genes have been patented and so they make money for the patent holders. Putting more money into a failed technology is wasteful, reckless and negligent. Read this list of non-GM breeding breakthroughs and then start asking Redman why he is not funding this type of research http://www.bangmfood.org/feed-the-world/17-feeding-the-world/14-non-gm-breakthroughs
Posted by Fran, 4/08/2010 10:33:59 AM, on Farm Weekly
Well said Merri Bee. Farmers should be improving their soil fertility, not looking for quick fixes, such as artificial fertilisers, GM and chemicals etc. They all deplete soil fertility. If we are to have any farming land left, we need to pay more attention to those people who aren't trying to make a profit from us.
Posted by Annie, 4/08/2010 12:00:03 PM, on Farm Weekly
Organic farming does not equal sustainable farming. Organic farmers suffer much higher losses from insects, meaning then need to plant a far greater amount of crop to obtain the same yield as a non-organically grown crop. They need to use crop-rotation rather than artificial fertilisers to keep the soil fertile, again increasing the amount of space needed to obtain a certain yield of crop. The fertilisers they do use (commonly cow dung sourced from their own farms) need to be used in greater amounts in terms of biomass than the crop which results from it. This means that they need to feed these cows more vegetable matter than the farm is actually capable of producing. There is also the fact that there is no conclusive research that organically grown foods are in fact healthier for humans than conventionally grown foods. Organic foods are for those with more money than sense.
Posted by Dan, 4/08/2010 2:07:29 PM, on Farm Weekly
Um Dan so how has farming survived for 10,000 years without being organic? Why is it only just been in the last 100 years that farming has become unsustainable? Why is this generation of kids going to be the first generation that won't outlive their parents? There is no conclusive evidence because the food industry funds the research, they only want to find the results that make them a bigger profit. You want evidence, go to a remote corner of the globe to a "poor" group of people which modern food and modern agriculture hasn't bastardised and then ask why are these people are so healthy and live so long?
Posted by Josh, 4/08/2010 9:12:31 PM, on Farm Weekly
Dan you certainly have your head firmly planted in the ground. Best practice eco-agriculture farms use inputs such as minerals to correct nutrient inbalances, composts and compost teas to stimulate soil micro-organisms, to then release the stored 'bank' of nutrients that are usually 'locked' up in soils. Crop rotation is an intelligent procedure to enabling the fixation of nitrogen by bacteria, add carbon and or oxygen to soils, and generally feed soils while breaking up parasite breeding cycles. Many best practice farms do not need any quick fixes for 'pests' as they are just not a problem. read some of P. Callahan's work on why this is so
Posted by brett sanders, 10/08/2010 3:41:29 PM, on Farm Weekly

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...