News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Rudd’s ETS to milk all consumers 

Rudd’s ETS to milk all consumers

11 Aug, 2009 05:25 PM
THE Federal Government must level with the Australian people about the real cost to consumers of its proposed carbon pollution reduction scheme, the Nationals warned today.

Answering a question from Nationals’ Leader Warren Truss in Parliament today, the Prime Minister admitted that the price of milk and other food products would go up, but he clearly did not know by how much.

“Independent research has made crystal clear that food production will take an almighty hit from the Rudd Government’s ill-considered and rushed ETS,” Mr Truss said.

“Economic modelling prepared earlier this year for the agriculture sector showed that farm output would be slashed by $2.4 billion a year by 2020 and by $10.9 billion annually by 2030. Production will decline in all sectors, with beef and dairy farmers hard hit.

“Although agriculture is excluded until 2015, the cost of inputs like energy, fertiliser and chemicals will rise rapidly from the scheme’s introduction date.

"Other research suggests the average sized farm will lose about $11,000 a year in income. Yet farmers will not be allowed to claim credits for the carbon sequestration they undertake.

“The average impact on a dairy farm is estimated to be more than $10,000 in energy costs alone.

"And dairy farmers cannot switch to solar power to do their pre-dawn and after-dark milking.

“Farmers will inevitably have to pass on these extra and unnecessary costs. But imported food products, including New Zealand dairy products, will not have to bear the cost of the Rudd CPRS, stacking our shelves with imported food and threatening our exports.

“The Government has run away from the truth on this matter by not instructing Treasury to do some appropriate modelling.

“Australians need to come to grips with the fact that the Rudd CPRS is not just about taxing big multinational companies. It affects everyone living in Australia, and hits everything they buy. The only excuse the Prime Minister can offer is that some poor families will receive compensation.

“The Prime Minister was unable in Parliament today to answer questions about the impact of his ETS on agriculture, public transport, taxis and milk prices, yet he expects the Coalition to vote for his legislation unchanged this week,” Mr Truss said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Farmers view Labor with deep misgivings, perceiving it as hostile towards them. They view the carbon tax proposals with even greater misgivings as it appears ignorant of modern conservation and sustainable farming practices. The predatory attitude towards farmers seems to regard all as similar to huge organistions such as the Vestey empire and ignore the smaller, hardworking families who make significant sacrifices to remain in business. In view of the predicted shortage of food Wong's attitude is irrational.
Posted by Jaycie, 12/08/2009 7:42:28 AM, on Farm Weekly
If we go nuclear any carbon tax can be thrown in the bin.
Posted by Hot air, 12/08/2009 10:58:48 AM, on Farm Weekly
It wouldn't matter one iota who was in power. Notice the ETS debate is not over whether to have one or not. It is how to construct it. It is effectively going to add 2.5% to the GST rate of 10%. Just another tax and they are playing on fear to swing it in ...
Posted by Overtaxed Underpaid, 12/08/2009 9:01:18 PM, on Farm Weekly
Here is the perfect opportunity for the various farmers representative bodies to put up or go home. Tell the federal government to shove the ETS and forget about it or face civil disorder. Very few rural people think it would be anything short of catastrophic for the whole rural community, and many farmers would be out of business. This is serious business, where the federal government is proposing to seriously harm thousands of families and businesses, for reasons wich many scientists tell us are not sound. There is way too much uncertainty in the scientific community for anything like consensus, and to cause such harm based on unproven evidence is not tolerable.
Posted by bill, 13/08/2009 6:17:57 AM, on Farm Weekly
Farmers being mostly price takers will not be able to absorb the costs even if it is exempt as there are products required for farming that will have carbon tax on them before they get to the farm gate. This is all part of the grand socialist plan to get farmers off the land as it is more difficult to regulate the 100,000 or so farmers, but a lot easier to regulate a few big farms.
Posted by Alan Mears, 13/08/2009 6:37:24 AM, on Farm Weekly

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
“Independent research has made crystal clear that food production will take an almighty hit from the Rudd Government’s ill-considered and rushed ETS,” Warren Truss said on Tuesday..
“Independent research has made crystal clear that food production will take an almighty hit from the Rudd Government’s ill-considered and rushed ETS,” Warren Truss said on Tuesday..
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
10 August, 2009
11 August, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe the RSPCA's claim that live exports can be ended without significantly hurting the economy?

Yes
(16.4%)

No
(80.2%)

Undecided
(3.3%)

Total Votes: 602
Poll Date: 09 August, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...