News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Anti-GM state futile: PGA 

Anti-GM state futile: PGA

4/09/2008 9:27:00 AM
Alan Carpenter's plan to label WA as the anti-GM state is about as futile as his promise to supply WA with power entirely from windmills, according to the Pastoralists and Graziers‘ Association (PGA).

PGA spokesman on GM Leon Bradley said the vision of Mr Carpenter sitting in a non- GM field of radishes telling the WA media how he was going to give his Agriculture Department more taxpayer money to use against GM technology, represented the Premier’s most ridiculous stunt yet.

“Alan Carpenter and his retiring Agriculture Minister continue to swim against the mounting flood of common-sense evidence in support of GM technology.

“Now he is threatening to throw away a few more taxpayer millions opposing GM in WA, when the cost to WA graingrowers alone of not being able to grow broadacre GM grain crops will be at least $150 million per year.

“The Premier knows that overseas buyers do not discriminate against GM grains from our overseas competitors and that they are certainly not paying any form of premium for non-GM produce.

“He needs to start listening to his own scientists within the Agriculture Department who strongly support the use of GM technology, instead of his anti-GM spin doctors.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Leon bradley should put up the figures to show us his claims. Most North American producers I have had contact with indicate they are definately no better off using GM technology. Early entry discounts on technology are rapidly decreased resulting in substantially higher enterprise costs after a few years. Show us your figures Leon and have the technology suppliers guarantee them for the next few years. Then contact Bruce Smith at Cootamundra NSW and have him verify them. He is currently promoting the new technology. Also do a comparison with hybrid IT and TT varieties, you may be suprised at just how costly GM is.
Posted by bazza on 5/09/2008 11:33:11 AM
The carpenter government may not be there to inhibit Mr Bradley's Bandwagon. Neither however will Garry Snook a strong GM advocate. Maybe if there was a proper look at the true economics of GM and the "risk" profile of the technology there may be a change in people's desire to head in the GM direction. We still have not received the results of the the Carpenter sponsored GM feed trials which were opposed by all GM advocates yet they were not able to provide data on feed trials. Hybrid IT and conventional canola varieties appear, given the limited data available, to stand up favourably with GM. Hopefully our seed banks can be kept free from GM contamination untill the truth is learned about both true cost and health impacts.
Posted by bazza on 7/09/2008 8:12:28 AM
Going over oldground again. How many times does this technology have to be proven and re-proven?
Posted by Roger on 8/09/2008 8:36:47 AM
bazza, what is the issue here? If farmers do not want to grow them then no-one is going to force them to. If they think they can make a buck then they will.

The current GM canola crop in NSW and Victoria includes trials that indicate RR canola will yield substantially higher than TT canola. This is in line with predictions by agronomists. The fact of the matter is that TT canola gives up about 10% yield to conventional varieties so it is hardly surprising that other sorts of herbicide tolerance out yield it.

Posted by Dan on 9/09/2008 8:46:07 AM
Production volume doesn't equate to profit. Long-term damage has to be paid for by someone if it eventuates. Legislation currently places all the responsability on the user ie you if you grow it. If the technology sellers are so sure why are they so adamant that you sign to accept all responsibility in the event there are some adverse outcomes.
Posted by Bazza on 9/09/2008 3:39:57 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

13/11/2008 | Cattle are getting a bad rap these days, so it's refreshing to see Britain's venerable National Trust getting into the business of "conservation cows".
Rural Outlets
 
Irwint HunterI
 
FW Subscriptions
 
Freedom Tanks
 
Nextra Inks
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Agrimaster
 
Rural Bookshop
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...