News 
 State News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 EU won't buy WA GM canola 

EU won't buy WA GM canola

20 Apr, 2010 08:31 AM
PREMIER Colin Barnett has been accused of hiding damaging letters from European grain traders in the lead up to last month's vote on genetically modified crops, which state that they would not be willing to buy grain from Western Australia if GM crops are grown.

According to anti-GM lobby group Gene Ethics, in a letter dated February 26, three European grain traders told Mr Barnett they would not buy WA grain if GM canola is grown.

Gene Ethics claims that Barnett and Agriculture Minister Redman hid this letter from the Lower House during the disallowance debate on March 10.

"Redman failed in his duty to mention possible market losses despite asserting that markets are the state's primary responsibility," Gene Ethics director Bob Phelps said.

"They hid the letter which could have affected the vote that passed approval for GM canola by the slim margin of 26 votes to 24.

"They had a clear duty to disclose the letter's existence and its contents before the disallowance vote.

"When Legislative Councillors debate Giz Watson's disallowance motion and vote in the next few days, they should stand up for GM-free on the basis of the letter and the government's deviousness."

And in another letter to the Premier sent last week Japanese buyers have renewed their commitment to buy GM-free canola.

"The Japanese are writing GM-free contracts with South Australian growers, where the government has extended their GM canola ban till 2014," Mr Phelps said.

"In Victoria last season, farmers who produced GM-free canola were paid up to $15 per tonne more than farmers who grew GM.

"Elders Toepfer and CBH - buyers and marketers of bulk grains - both said they have markets for GM-free in Europe and Japan tht would not tolerate GM contaminated supplies.

"As a result, neither company would buy canola from any receival depot that handled GM.

"We call on the WA parliament to disallow the governments exemption from its GM-free Zone laws, so that commercial Roundup tolerant canola would continue to be prohibited as it is in South Australia and Tasmania."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Before Barnett and Redman resign, I'd like them to explain to the public why they misled parliament and the WA public, why they let down the canola growers of WA, why they let down the canola consumers of Australia, and exactly whose interests they have been prioritising. And no bull this time, please.
Posted by small family farms, 20/04/2010 5:59:09 PM, on Farm Weekly
Could one expect anything less from a WA government that's sold out to the agrochemical giants? Both the WA and Federal governments have put the interests of mega-corpoations first at the expense of people's health and their right to consume food free from genetic manipulation.
Posted by Ian, 20/04/2010 11:42:51 PM, on Farm Weekly
Who are these EU and Japanese traders and how big are they? We always knew that there would be a small market for non-GM, and this is what is being reflected here. Yes, there will be some buyers who demand non-GM and as the article suggests are willing to pay more for it. That's what a niche market is people! The Japanese in general have been accepting Canadian GM canola for a decade. As for the EU, we don't sell much canola to the anyway. Elders is also a minor canola seed buyer. Another beat up by the anti GM lobby. Delve a bit deeper....
Posted by John, 21/04/2010 4:48:53 AM, on Farm Weekly
Why are we not surprised, this is typical of the deceit that surrounds the whole GM patenting and Government protection of this insidious method of producing crops that are neither safe or needed. Farmers who foolishly embrace GM crops will rue the day they allowed themselves to be so easily misled. Those involved with this irresponsible contamination, must be held accountable for the cleanup. Minister Redman must resign immediately.
Posted by ggwagga, 21/04/2010 5:34:07 AM, on Farm Weekly
Gene-Ethics is a one-man lobby group with a flexible relationship to factual accuracy. When somebody starts paying a premium for non-GM canola, and buys it in reasonable quantities, then you'll know the truth. That's called market choice.
Posted by dickytiger, 21/04/2010 7:50:31 AM, on Farm Weekly
How is it "hiding" to not automatically supply information that is already well known - i.e. that the EU aren't buyers of GM canola. If you can determine something in 30 seconds with Google, or by asking any reasonably informed person then there's no cover-up. Move along; nothing to see here.
Posted by DMS, 21/04/2010 8:56:08 AM, on Farm Weekly
Wonder why that is that they won't buy from us? They buy from Canada and that is just about 100% GM, have done for years. Maybe it's just got to do with they burn it as biofuel, same price though. What are we going to do about the glyphosate resistant radish that farmers have bred? This could cause the super-weed we have all been dreading for years! How are we going to keep that glyphosate resistant radish from cross pollinating with our GM-free canola? What about identification let alone segregation. What if glyphosate resistant radish seed gets into cereals and we buy those cereals back from CBH for feed? We could have a disaster here on our hands ladies and gentlemen!
Posted by Roger Crook, 22/04/2010 2:44:25 AM, on Farm Weekly
What's that sound? Isn't it the sound of the biotech lobby and govt ministers scurrying around in damage control mode? Looks like the smoke and mirrors world of GM politics just got a whole lot thicker. Undisclosed letters, results from trials not being published, contamination "incidents" not being explained, slandering independent researchers like Judy Carman before results are even published, WA local shires declaring themselves GM-free, protesters marching on parliament. Sounds like somethings brewing big time. If I were a canola farmer in WA, I'd be nervous as all get-out about hitching my entire farming business on such a contentious shaky house of cards like GM canola. Especially when it doesn't return better prices!
Posted by Greg Revell, 22/04/2010 10:03:20 AM, on Farm Weekly
EU won't buy WA GM canola 20 Apr, 2010 10:31 AM Well, we knew that all along. No one wants GM crops, except the people that peddle them and their stooges. So we have to ask: why is the WA Government so hell-bent on introducing GM crops? When will they come clean and answer that question?
Posted by Peter Hill, 22/04/2010 5:28:58 PM, on Farm Weekly
Let us be quite clear about this. Canada is the biggest canola grower in the world. Canada sells, canola, canola oil and canola meal, that is fed to livestock to produce milk and wool. Canada has been growing GM canola for close on 20 years. Japan has been a customer for Canadian canola products since the first GM crop was produced. The EU has bought Canadian canola, used the oil and, presumably, fed the canola meal to its livestock. The above applies to many countries around the world. What I want to know from the anti GM lobby, many of whom are farmers and many if not all use glyphosate (Roundup et al), what are we going to do about the Round Up Ready radish that the users of glyphosate have isolated and which, if they are right about GM canola cross-pollination, has the capacity to produce an un-patented 'GM' canola by cross pollinating with their 'clean' non-GM canola?
Posted by Roger Crook, 23/04/2010 8:41:14 AM, on Farm Weekly
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...