News 
 State News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 GM crops not just for rich farmers 

GM crops not just for rich farmers

17 Nov, 2009 08:14 AM
ONE of the most common criticisms of GM technology is that it's major incarnation in the form of herbicide resistant traits is only of benefit to relatively well-off first-world farmers and is of little benefit to poor growers in the third-world - a misconception, according to Monsanto’s director of research Harvey Glick.

Dr Glick said GM technology would play a large role in assisting the billions of subsistence and low-income farmers worldwide who eke out a living from less than five acres (2.1ha), and by doing so, assist international food security.

Dr Glick said both first generation traits, such as herbicide resistance, and traits close to being rolled out, such as drought tolerance and nitrogen efficiency, would aid poor farmers.

"We see biotechnology as a means to increase yields and a way to reduce crop inputs," he said.

"Farmers will be able to replace chemical use with GM traits, while the benefits of drought tolerance and nitrogen efficiency are self-explanatory."

Dr Glick said he had been intrigued by study results showing where the major economic boosts from the use of GM had taken place.

"Some of the studies have shown that 60pc of income increases due to the use of GM technology has come from the developing world.

"Claims that the technology is only designed for farmers more able to pay for the technology are not right – GM has provided equal benefits to large and small farmers.

"This is a study result based on income, so it doesn’t even take into account the tremendous benefits for subsistence farmers that does not come through the books, due to the fact that the crop is kept at home."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Dr Glick is talking rubbish as the report by Organic Centre 19/11/09 "Impacts of G E Crops" shows an increase in the use of pesticides in the U S in the last 13 years of 383 million pounds of pesticides. Figures for 2008 show an increase of 26% per acre, of pesticides. Dr Glick works for Monsanto, who has consistently claimed that thei GM seed reduces the use of pesticides. Once again I ask the question "Why would a corporation which derives the bulk of its profit from the sale of pesticides, sell seed which reduces the use of pesticides?" 26 years and yet to prove that GM crops are any better than non GM ! The vast majority of the worlds developed countries don't want a bar of GM. America and Canada are stuck with it becase they can't get out of Monsanto's clutches! The Agricultural Minister in S A and the Shadow Minister agreed to ban GM until 2014 saying "there is no acceptable evidence that G M provides better crops than non G M. Fortunately, most of our farmers are smart enough to avoid GM like the plague which it certainly is, but there are a few who seem to be either, not so smart or have been blinded by the promises of Monsanto. "None so blind as those who cannot see!"
Posted by creeker, 21/03/2010 6:56:07 AM, on Farm Weekly

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...