News 
 State News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Has WA sacrificed its GM-free competitive advantage? 

Has WA sacrificed its GM-free competitive advantage?

26 Jan, 2010 07:30 AM
GROUPS opposed to genetically modified canola crops are demanding the Western Australian parliament to disallow the exemption from the law that would permit the State's first commercial crops, arguing the decision will cost farmers valuable GM-free markets.

Agriculture Minister Terry Redman and Premier Colin Barnett yesterday approved an exemption order under the Genetically Modified Crops Free Areas Act 2003 to permit the cultivation of GM canola, arguing the move will offer growers added choice in their cropping systems.

The decision was welcomed by farmer groups, including WAFarmers which says new GM canola varieties offer farmers the potential for superior weed control, higher yields and oil quality, environmental benefits and better returns than current conventional varieties.

"To date, WA farmers have had to stand by while growers in the eastern States and around the world have had the choice to use this technology," WAFarmers director of policy Alan Hill said. "Today this changes, and our farmers can continue to meet the needs of a growing population."

However, the Gene Ethics Network says the move actually ignores consumer demands, and is providing State politicians with the data needed to reject the exemption order when it comes up for review.

"Redman and Barnett are sacrificing the state's unique competitive advantage and premium prices for GM-free foods available in global canola markets," Gene Ethics director Bob Phelps said.

"WA, SA and Tasmania are the only reliable exporters of GM-free canola world-wide and we are reaping the rewards.

"The Premier and Minister are misusing their power and shirking their responsibility to declare GM and GM-free Zones over all or part of the state to protect and promote the markets for clean, green, GM-free WA foods.

"Most Western Australian shoppers, and shoppers in our top-five markets overseas - Netherlands, France, Pakistan, Japan and Belgium - want to stay GM-free.

"We should not side with our main GM competitor Canada against the wishes of our customers. It's just bad business."

However, Mr Hill said that GM would not replace traditional varieties of canola but instead would provide some farmers with an additional tool that they could use to manage weeds and pests, with the potential to increase yields and returns.

GM canola varieties available in Australia have been deemed safe for human health and the environment by the Australian Gene Technology Regulator since 2003.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
You silly people this is a disaster look it up on u tube ,in the tests animals had liver and kidney damage in a few mths of eating it .its all about controlling our food supply and no one being able to have their own seed you fools.
Posted by melanie, 26/01/2010 10:16:22 AM, on Farm Weekly
"...would provide some farmers with an additional tool that they could use to manage weeds.." Must be joking. Who is mis-informing WAfarmers director Hill? Think about it? What farmers have problems with herbicide resistant weeds? Farmers that use cropping systems that mis-manage weeds. What will happen with this Roundup system? - Exactly the same thing - within a few years. Google "superweeds pigweed" Ryegrass is already resistant to glyphosate in two well-defined ways. What will happen when the use of glyphosate increases? What other stronger herbicides are going to be used to try to slow glyphosate resistance? Meanwhile WA food will be polluted, and yes it's another untested GM crop and we await Dr Judy Carman et al's study. Certainly GM canola contains some of the same corrupted genetic material that is contained in the crops that have been studied and indicate liver and kidney failure, and altered immune response. Forget our regulators.
Posted by Madeleine Love, 26/01/2010 10:19:58 AM, on Farm Weekly
Not only has Terry Redman ignored consumers he has ignored the findings of the report that he actually commisioned to review the GM Act. One of the findings was to involve the public and encourage transparency when making exemptions such as this one for GM canola. The trial was a failure, when even at their vigilant best 11 errors occured from managing just 1200 tonnes of canola grown by a dozen or so farmers. Mutiply that by ten and we will have a major contamination event in WA.
Posted by Hebe, 26/01/2010 11:34:08 PM, on Farm Weekly
It is unfortunate that in today’s world UTUBE and other such media sources are relied upon as a knowledge base. It so often represents a bias and non-refereed opinion. Global food production needs to increase at such a significant rate to avoid the starvation of so many millions of people during the coming years that we need to utilize every new technology available to us.
Posted by Informed, 27/01/2010 12:36:28 AM, on Farm Weekly
Here we go again. Hebe and Madeline have just been waiting for this day. Waiting to say, yet again, that they consider farmers and their advisers are lacking in the ability to make sensible and rational decisions based on all the material available and that they should be able to do it for them. These critics of farmers fail to recognise or accept that Japan has been importing GM canola from Canada ever since the first GM variety was introduced. They have crushed that canola and the Japanese have consumed that oil. They have fed the canola meal to their livestock and consumed those livestock. As I have said many times before. The population of the world has doubled in my lifetime. They said we couldn't do it but we did, we fed the world. Our critics do so with the comfort of a full belly, as they have always done. Our critics would also be welcomed as new farmers. Perhaps they can show us how to make a real profit year on year, they obviously know how.
Posted by Roger Crook, 27/01/2010 7:24:12 AM, on Farm Weekly
Roger - in the last few years 90 per cent of WA's canola has gone to Europe - a market that definitely does not accept GM. ABARE have acknowledged that if WA adopts GM canola it could be a problem for EU exports, due to the adventitious contamination threshold of 0.9 per cent. A Canadian study showed that over 90 per cent of certified non-GM canola seed in Canada is contaminated with GM material - often at levels above 0.9 per cent. By allowing the adoption of GM canola, the WA government is jeopardising canola exports to Europe - and all for a technology with no proven benefits. The only independent trials of GM canola were the GRDC trials - the results of which were released last year. These showed no yield gain associated with GM canola. The only beneficiaries of GM canola will be the GM crop industry. It is appalling that the Government has chosen to side with it - rather than listen to the views of the majority of consumers and farmers. Independent polling by Newspoll last year shows that the majority of West Australians want the GM crop ban to stay in place.
Posted by Lou, 27/01/2010 12:55:33 PM, on Farm Weekly
Roger...you have fallen for the 'feed the starving millions' mantra peddled out by Big Biotech and its cronies. Having met with Japanese consumer reps I know their real concerns regarding GM canola and their insistence for GM free (not contaminated non GM) and with labelling laws tightening in the EU where even products from GM-fed animals is now labelled so that the majority of consumers can avoid them the market for GM is narrowing. GM cropping means large-scale farming which removes small farmers from their land, and these are the ones who starve...not through lack of food, but lack of income to buy it.
Posted by Hebe, 27/01/2010 1:12:12 PM, on Farm Weekly
Lou, Europe bought GM canola from Canada last year. Hebe. Don't measure your wheat with someone else's bushell. I have been farming for over 50 years, so I have been part of it. It may surprise you that by far the majority of farmers are slow to change because any change has the potential to affect income. It may also surprise you that many of us are well educated and quite capable of reading and understand scientific information. As for the market shrinking, Canada canola area forecast to increase 2010. Although area is rotation dependent. Tell us where GM technology has changed the demographics of agriculture and where that change has been any different than that change that has taken place over the last forty years. In Australia in the last forty years broadacre farms have doubled in size. Corporate farming to date has been a minor buyer and a recent major seller. That includes OS investors.
Posted by Roger Crook, 28/01/2010 3:19:13 AM, on Farm Weekly
I find it ironic when teaching overseas that the very people growing GM crops sought out Australian products because of their GM free and the 'green' image. Niche markets are big business, and losing a market edge is a retrograde step.
Posted by Jaycie, 28/01/2010 5:22:49 PM, on Farm Weekly
Jaycie They could grow their own. They do have an agriculture. A heavily subsidised agriculture. They protect their markets, we do not have free access to those markets. Japan cherry picks. Wake up, please.
Posted by Roger Crook, 29/01/2010 6:35:18 AM, on Farm Weekly

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...