News 
 State News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Submissions sought on GM freedom act 

Submissions sought on GM freedom act

24 Jul, 2009 02:00 AM
AGRICULTURE and Food Minister Terry Redman has called for public submissions into the review of the Genetically Modified Crops Free Areas Act.

The Act came into operation in WA on December 24, 2003.

It prohibits the cultivation of certain genetically modified (GM) crops in designated areas of WA and provides for their destruction in certain cases.

The Act requires a review to be carried out five years after its commencement and for a report to be tabled in State Parliament by December 24, 2009.

Former parliamentary counsel Greg Calcutt has been appointed to undertake the review.

"The review will look at the need for the Act and whether it is appropriate; its operations and effectiveness; and the orders prohibiting the cultivation of GM crops and the granting of exemptions," Mr Redman said.

"Submissions from the public relating to the Act are welcome; however, this review is not a general inquiry into gene technology and GM organisms.

"Issues such as the safety and labelling of GM foods, legal liability, use of pesticides, intellectual property and the role of multinationals are not covered by the scope of this review.

"The review also does not relate to the policy behind the current GM canola trials being undertaken in WA.

"It will look at the effectiveness of the Act, rather than what policy should or should not be implemented via the Act."

Network of Concerned Farmers national spokesperson Julie Newman said the review of the act deliberately excluded all of the risks associated with GMs and the serious concerns about the lack of accountability in using them.

"It's pretty obvious that the act is not effective if the minister has authorised large scale commercial growing of GM crops when there is a moratorium which is supposed to ban them," she said.

"The review already seems to have a pre-set agenda.

"We don't want to grow GM and we don't want our rights removed."

Gene Ethics director Bob Phelps said the "so-called review" may eliminate the checks and balances on GM crops.

The public submission period will run from July 17 to August 14.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What? We have a GM Act?
Posted by Hebe, 24/07/2009 10:36:07 AM, on Farm Weekly
What is not said in this article is the details on the submission. Interested persons and organisations are invited to make submissions to the review about the need for the Act – i.e. is the purpose of the Act still appropriate? If so, do the current provisions of the Act provide the best way of achieving the purpose or are there alternatives? The operation of the Act? The effectiveness of the Act? The orders made under the Act prohibiting the cultivation of GM crops and granting exemptions from that prohibition. A background paper is available at www.agric.wa.gov.au under Hot Topics. Please note that the review is NOT a general inquiry into gene technology and genetically modified organisms. The background paper refers to specific issues that are beyond the scope of the review, e.g. safety and labelling of genetically modified food, legal liability, etc. The submission will ignore anything of importance like GM safety or labelling which I believe is very important but being ignored-sound familiar? The issues to submit would be: contamination, threat to non-GM farmers, organic growers and bee keepers. Please have your say if you are interested in saving our farms.
Posted by Vicki Wilson, 30/07/2009 12:03:57 PM, on Farm Weekly
Mr Redman seems to think that the masses are ignorent. As an Australian citizen I believe that I have the right to farm sustainably; to be free of contamination from outside sources; to have a supply of bees for pollination of crops; and to trade in a free market. I believe that this review will remove this right, and as a Certified Biodynamic farmer it may result in decertification. Mr Redman is sprinting, screaming his wants to the finishing line, demolishing any possible glitches to his GMO Dream. Money should not be spent shoring up any holes of a legal nature in an act that should consider the needs and rights of all. Long term health issues -10 + years, associated with GM crops, and the lack of compulsory labelling, adding to the risk, should lie firmly as legal responsibility and liability.
Posted by handicap, 2/08/2009 8:59:05 AM, on Farm Weekly

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...