News 
 State News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Thanks for GM trials, now lift the ban 

Thanks for GM trials, now lift the ban

13 Aug, 2009 02:00 AM
ORGANISERS went to great lengths to maintain an agronomic focus on last week's Genetically Modified (GM) canola field days and steer clear of industry politics.

However, political lobbying is destined to play a critical role in the overall process and can't be ignored.

The effectiveness of the lobbying could prove just as telling in the final wash-up on the technology's future, as the GM crop's actual yield and performance.

The man at the centre of the decision-making is Agriculture and Food Minister Terry Redman.

He will attend another Roundup Ready canola field day tomorrow, at the Agriculture and Food Department's WA Northern Sandplain Research Station at Eradu.

Mr Redman will be accompanied by Geraldton MLA Ian Blayney, and will no doubt use the experience to help gauge further opinion.

The Minister is acutely aware that farmers are getting anxious about potentially growing the controversial crop on their farms next season, and will be hoping they can catch up with biotechnology users in other parts of the world, if the State Government lifts the current moratoria on its commercial production.

In WA, the GM Crops Free Areas Act 2003 is currently under review with the Government calling for public submissions by the August 14 closing date.

Mr Redman allowed an exemption to the Act this year, giving the green light to the large scale trials on 17 farms in WA, and three research stations, for a total of about 850ha.

Grains industry participants will now turn their attention to Mr Redman and the Liberal-National Government, urging them to lift the ban completely.

Speaking at the field walk through the GM crop on his farm last week, Meckering graingrower John Snooke said he had a clear message to send Mr Redman about the technology's future.

"Firstly I would like to thank the partnership in Government for allowing the trials to go ahead this season," he said.

"We have been able to visually see the technology in use here in WA and we have learnt about the markets this year.

"The key message is that growers want choice.

"We have a massive market for the product and the Australian grains industry has the ability and the willingness to segregate GM canola.

"It will help us become sustainable on many different levels."

Read full story in this week's Farm Weekly.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Yes, growers want choice. The choice to grow conventional non-GM grain. Didn't anyone in the West hear the Canadian farmers say they could no longer source conventional non GM grain in Canada, and that CONTAMINATION COULD NOT BE AVOIDED. One has to only look at the size of the canola seed and drive along country roads to know what happens. Monsanto don't care about this because they can foresee a Canadian situation developing here and that's obviously in their interest. Elsewhere in 'The Land' you can read about the lack of links between farm production and health. GM Canola is a very good example - no independent testing, no testing on humans. We do more testing on our drugs than we do our grains, and how many of us consume more grain than drug? Communities are 'dying' in the US - all the money for/from cropping is going out of the local towns - off to some Monsanto Head Office. Massive market? Where would that be... Monsanto's aim is to contaminate all cropping land and then it will have a market by default. Be aware that in the eastern states Monsanto has been promulgating how successful their GM yield was last year. These figures are not matched by our GRDC Report.
Posted by Farmer Janet, 13/08/2009 4:59:02 PM, on Farm Weekly
I do not want any GM plants on my farm. My customers do not want any GMOs in their food. Many Australians would choose to avoid GM food. Since GrainCorp is mixing GM canola with non-GM canola this year in NSW, and since some farmers such as those mentioned above are growing it - how am I meant to keep it off my farm and out of my production system? What happens if I get contamination issues from a neighbour? Who pays for my lost markets? Certainly not Monsanto....
Posted by brett sanders, 15/08/2009 4:42:26 PM, on Farm Weekly
Scientific American has just printed up on seeds and GM, a thing research professors in fear of their tenures have been afraid to go public on. There is no independent research, the peer reviewed journals process has been bought out. End user agreements control any objective testing or publishing. Why haven't we as a leading research nation demanded independent multi-generational tests from our universities prior to commercialisation?
Posted by duped, 17/08/2009 3:25:59 PM, on Farm Weekly
There have been numerous studies looking at the safety of GM foods, and they found no evidence of risk. People in the US have been eating GM for decades, so there is long-term data. But in the case of canola, what is there to test? The oil is chemically identical to that from non-GM, and humans don't eat the grain. Besides, some 'conventional' crop-breeding techniques use drastic methods to trigger mutations that are little different to GM - but ignorant people don't object to those because they have no idea.
Posted by be rational, 19/08/2009 1:26:41 PM, on Farm Weekly
John Snooke says: “The key message is that growers want choice.” "We have a massive market for the product and the Australian grains industry has the ability and the willingness to segregate GM canola. It will help us become sustainable on many different levels." My key message is that people should have a right to farm and eat GM Free, and John's CHOICE to grow GM will take away those rights. We have a much bigger market for GM Free canola. The grains industry has no long term ability or willingness to segregate GM canola as has been seen in the Eastern states after only one season and the exact same promises. All costs of segregation will be borne by the non GM and organic farmers who will soon become extinct in a GM state. GM is the most unsustainable chemically intensive method of farming which in the US and India has led to a 14-15 fold increase in the use of herbicides. Round Up resistant weeds (superweeds) have developed. Biodynamic and Organic farming can truthfully claim to be sustainable Mr Snooke, but truth is trampled on in stampedes. "Rational", in the decades that GM has been eaten we have seen asthma, autism, excema and allergies skyrocket in kids.
Posted by Merri Bee, 20/08/2009 6:32:42 AM, on Farm Weekly
"....the Australian grains industry has the ability and the willingness to segregate GM canola". - NOT so. In Victoria, Graincorp does not segregate the canola seeds at the silos. To market GM-free costs extra! No one asks for GM, it is no cheaper for food manufacturers to buy, it just pushes up the price for Non-GM which costs more to segregate at the silo. How does that equate to choice???
Posted by Boycottcanola, 21/08/2009 5:40:45 AM, on Farm Weekly

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Meckering farmer John Snooke in his GM canola trial crop.
Meckering farmer John Snooke in his GM canola trial crop.

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...