News 
 State News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 Grains 
 Nicoletti to build silos if CBH stays co-op 

Nicoletti to build silos if CBH stays co-op

11 Mar, 2010 03:33 PM
THE patriarch of Australia's biggest farming family is a man willing to put his money where his mouth is.

According to The Australian Financial Review, John Nicoletti is prepared to spend $3 million of his own money to build silos to starve CBH Group of its largest customer if next week's historic board elections fail to deliver seats to growers seeking to corporatise Australia's largest grains handler and potentially pave the way for a stock­market listing.

It has been called the crossroads election as the CBH board grapples with adapting to increasing competition following deregulation and defend its position as Western Australia's major storage, handling and grain exporter.

A sharemarket listing would give CBH greater access to capital and a commercial edge many growers ­argue is lacking under its antiquated co-operative structure, especially as deep-pocketed foreign rivals grow their presence in the deregulated grain markets.

"It should be corporatised and listed on the stock exchange as soon as possible," Nicoletti said. "If it doesn't it is going to crumble. Not to do it is just bullshit."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
John, I agree with you. My farm is not the same scale as yours but CBH is not delivering the service levels I need. If I had your capacity it would be an easy decision to compete with an outdated storage operator. In my position I would welcome a new player in the storage business in WA, AWB, Viterra or Cargill come on in.
Posted by farmer, 11/03/2010 7:03:57 PM, on Farm Weekly
Whose money?
Posted by bazza, 11/03/2010 9:42:31 PM, on Farm Weekly
So let me see, we flog off CBH and that will bail out a few growers who are in financial difficulties. Next thing the new owners will rightly want a return on their investment, so handling charges will have to go much higher for that. Personally I think that would be quite foolish.
Posted by Kanzi, 12/03/2010 5:59:10 AM, on Farm Weekly
Someone tell me where there is a better grain handling system in the world. I have yet to see one that even comes close. I see corporatising CBH as the present growers cashing in on the business assets that were created by the growers over the life time of CBH, who received no dividend. I wonder how many would before it, if you got your shares allocated on tonnes delivered over the life time of the company, and those who are unable to claim, or untraceable, should have their value given to co-operative lobby groups, that lobby on behalf of the grain industry. Seems fairer then the greed show now, the very greed farmers complain about from the non farm sector. Just a thought for the morning.
Posted by dunart, 12/03/2010 6:43:56 AM, on Farm Weekly
If CBH is corporatised then growers will slowly lose control as shares are sold off. Currently all growers benefit from the system, but if corporatised only the bigger growers will benefit as they use their market power to seek better trading terms for themselves. Of course we'll also lament the loss of another Australian icon and wonder how a foreign company could end up controlling our industry. John, if you want to go your own way, go for it but no doubt you will need to use infrastructure built by the cooperative with whom you no longer wish to associate.
Posted by Ed, 12/03/2010 8:34:00 AM, on Farm Weekly
CBH needs to corporatise immediately. The board (of farmers) is elected on a politically motivated system and they are not elected for any business acumen or skill. Next season they will have real competition that will take away millions of tonnes and make CBH uncompetitive. They will have to increase prices just to survive. If corporatised farmers have on their balance sheets their equity in CBH. Farmers would then have the choice - they could keep the shares in CBH for retirement etc... or pay off debt - the choice would be each individual's - this is fair. It is and the truth is CBH has a burden of being hijacked by a group of politically inspired group and not run as a business. John Nickoletti is correct and CBH would be a much better company if it could be run like a business not a plaything for WAFF.
Posted by shimmi, 12/03/2010 8:38:57 AM, on Farm Weekly
Dunart, if we keep CBH as a co-op it will corporatise at some point. The value will be captured by our children or the bloke who buys the farm when we exit. Is that fair? Is it the right thing to do?? There is another pathway: we as CBH members keep CBH just the way it is. Competition (Cargill, AWB or who ever) will build competing export pathway and there will be very little value in CBH. We as current farmers will lose or our children will lose and WA will lose. To hold something so close untill it is worthless makes no sense. Let CBH free and if it provides commercial value it will survive and grow, if it doesn't it will fail or be brought out ,so be it.
Posted by farmer, 12/03/2010 8:46:16 AM, on Farm Weekly
All the corporate supporters want is to get their hands on the money. This entity was built up by many over many years. The corporatisers will sell their share as soon as possible and CBH will fall into non-grower hands, probably into overseas interests.
Posted by Len, 12/03/2010 12:46:56 PM, on Farm Weekly
Len, If CBH falls into non-grower hands it will only be as a result of growers selling. Growers will sell if the board and management fail to run the business efficently. If management are able to deliver superior service and improving profitability why would growers wish to sell their shares????? Failing to corporatise now is certain to deliver a non competitive business that will continue to run second or worse in a commercial enviroment. There has been enough value destroyed in CBH already, we should not throw the rest away !!!!!
Posted by mark, 12/03/2010 3:40:16 PM, on Farm Weekly
Shimmi, excuse my ignorance but can you explain to me why you think that CBH is a 'plaything' for WA Farmers Federation? Just curious. What influence does WAFF have over CBH that others don't??
Posted by whistlin'dixie, 12/03/2010 8:57:33 PM, on Farm Weekly
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
John Nicoletti.
John Nicoletti.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
04 February, 2010
12 February, 2010
02 February, 2010
03 February, 2010
09 October, 2009
03 November, 2009
15 February, 2010
01 March, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...