News 
 State News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 WAMMCO posts second biggest profit 

WAMMCO posts second biggest profit

20/08/2008 3:50:00 PM
PROCESSORS could be in for a tough time next year, but sheep producers should benefit from a large reduction in WA's sheep flock, according to WAMMCO chief executive Des Griffiths.

This week WAMMCO announced its second best annual profit of $2.7 million for the past financial year after paying qualifying producer members a pool bonus of $1m.

The result was an improvement of $1.3m on 2006-07 profit of $1.4m.

The member pool bonus was maintained at 5pc of the value of livestock supplied by qualifying members for the fourth consecutive year, resulting in a distribution of an additional $1m.

Mutton was also included in the pool distribution for the first time this year with an average payment of $1.07 a head.

The average bonus payment for qualifying lambs was $3.37 a head with a top figure of $5.30 a head.

WAMMCO has distributed a total of $3.8m to members over the past four years in the form of additional bonuses.

Pre-tax net profit was achieved on reduced turnover of $89m ($91.1m in 2006-07), mainly due to the lower numbers of lamb processed in the first half.

The fall in revenue was partially offset by an increase in sales revenue for extra value added production.

WAMMCO paid an average price per head to lamb producers of $65.55, down marginally from $65.90 the previous year.

However the average weight per head of lambs processed was slightly lighter at 21.04kg , down from 21.3kg the previous year.

Mr Griffiths said while the year had been challenging for members, customers and WAMMCO itself, the result was driven by a higher throughput of capital or breeding stock.

He said this could mean higher sheep prices next year, but lower numbers for processors to source.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
norman (executive chairman i think) was on the radio early this week, stated the value of skins was directly related to quantity & quality of the wool on the skins. when there's $20 worth of wool, why are we paid $4? the increase in sales revenue was attributed to extra value added production (stated above), it sounds like wammco members are getting fleeced. would you agree?
Posted by richard on 21/08/2008 7:12:29 AM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

13/11/2008 | Cattle are getting a bad rap these days, so it's refreshing to see Britain's venerable National Trust getting into the business of "conservation cows".
Freedom Tanks
 
FW Subscriptions
 
Irwint HunterI
 
Rural Outlets
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Nextra Inks
 
Agrimaster
 
Rural Bookshop
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...