News 
 State News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Mixed mulesing messages 

Mixed mulesing messages

09 Jul, 2009 07:59 AM
AUSTRALIAN Wool Innovation (AWI) has sent mixed messages to farmers after being asked whether or not it would support those who continue to mules after the 2010 deadline.

AWI directors Meredith Sheil and David Webster attended the WAFarmers Merredin zone meeting held at Narembeen last week, where Dr Sheil gave a presentation about AWI's research and development of mulesing alternatives.

During question time at the meeting, WAFarmers president Mike Norton asked Mr Webster and Dr Sheil if AWI was prepared to fully support farmers when the 2010 deadline rolled around and they were still mulesing.

"Will you get behind farmers or go to ground?" Mr Norton asked.

The response he received demonstrated that not all AWI directors are in agreement on the issue.

Dr Sheil gave a somewhat ambiguous answer and said it was not really AWI's role and they would continue to concentrate on researching and developing alternatives.

"What we're doing today, we'll be doing tomorrow," Dr Sheil said.

However Mr Webster's reply was more of a crowd pleaser.

"There is no way that we will abandon growers," Mr Webster said.

"This issue has widened now and it's not just a wool growers' problem, this is an issue for the entire sheep industry.

"I think we are obliged to protect the integrity of farmers.

"This whole thing was a disaster right from the start and it is absolutely unquestionable that the vast majority of growers cannot run livestock successfully without mulesing."

Mr Norton said the varied responses showed that there were mixed messages coming from AWI on the issue.

"David Webster gave the right answer but Dr Sheil's was a bit more coy," he said.

"We had Brenda McGahan in here on Monday and her response was much the same at Dr Sheil's.

"It's obviously a very sensitive issue and it would appear that some directors have more of an opinion on the topic than others.

"A fair percentage of farmers will continue mulesing their sheep with pain relief post 2010 because they simply have no other viable option.

"At the moment there is no real incentive for farmers to stop mulesing, it is simply a tool they need in their kit."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The trouble is that the "incentive" is a loss of market access for our wool and customers going to other countries and other fibres because we are seen not to be trying to change.

Whether AWI supports us in not mulesing is immaterial if no-one wants our product.

There are alternatives - not of the silver bullet variety but alternatives just the same.

Posted by The Kid, 9/07/2009 9:16:20 AM, on Farm Weekly
It is a very big problem for the wool industry that those of the industry leadership who joined with AWI in the very poorly considered lawsuit against PETA are bound by the awful agreement which was signed off with PETA to terminate the lawsuit.

Should any of them do or say anything which PETA regards as offensive to that agreement they may find themselves subjected to very considerable personal costs should PETA lodge a complaint with the court under which that agreement was drawn up.

This means that those leaders who were party to that agreement are very unlikely to give any support to growers who disagree with that agreement.

They should, before passing comment, declare their position in that regard. AWI faces the same problem.

It, too, is bound by that agreement and many other commitments which were made by the previous management of AWI.

The whole industry is walking on hot coals thanks to a number of terrible errors which were made by AWI. Without mulesing, there won't be much wool. That is OK by PETA.

Posted by Ted O'Brien., 9/07/2009 10:16:08 AM, on Farm Weekly
Where is the common sense? Facts are in Australia sheep get fly stike, mulesing prevents this. If the fly didn't exist - no need to do the preventative treatment.
Posted by cherrygrove, 9/07/2009 11:20:08 AM, on Farm Weekly
Don't stop mulesing and pay the penalty - top mills will not buy your wool. This head in the sand attitude is what is killing our industry. What did their ancestors do before mulesing? I have never mulesed. I do not have a problem with blowfly strike. You breed sheep to suit the conditions.
Posted by Helen Clark, 10/07/2009 7:13:24 AM, on Farm Weekly
The European view is if mulesing is essential then why does Australia have sheep? It has become a game of bluff - no one has to buy Australian wool nor do we have to sell.

Webster's answer is not correct, it is merely populist. If buyers want wool from sheep not mulesed then they must walk past mulesed wool and solely buy certified mulesing free wool.

Let those who have stopped mulesing develop this market and take advantage of buyer sentiment. Both sides in this equation should stop talking and start acting, forget AWI.

Posted by Observant, 10/07/2009 8:02:53 AM, on Farm Weekly
Well, the AWI directors are at least consistent in their inconsistency. Meredith keeps trying to flog pain relief as the answer. David and Wally keep telling growers they should keep mulesing if they want to.

All at AWI keep trying to pretend that no 2010 deadline exists. No one at AWI is listening to what the customers want. Keep fiddling Nero, keep fiddling...

Posted by Sir George, 10/07/2009 11:44:11 AM, on Farm Weekly
George. Apart from the fact that wool is a stand out product in its own right, which gives it a head start, the customers buy what they are told to buy. The tool is promotion. There are two reasons why our customers pay any attention to this bunch of fringe dwellers. First is that the fringe dwellers have been the only ones doing any promoting over the last six years or more, and secondly, we no longer have enough wool to supply all of those customers anyway. Our mates Wal and David along with the rest at AWI must first sort out the mess bequeathed them by the previous management at AWI and then select which part of the trading mechanism will survive the huge cut in production so that that area can be targeted with promotion to rebuild the trade in wool. And, George, they must do this with a target of an indicator price of around 2,000c within two years. Don't imagine that this is not achievable and sustainable.
Posted by Ted O'Brien., 14/07/2009 7:13:46 AM, on Farm Weekly
Helen, never had shearers run 2-3 weeks late. Never been on the end of unseasonal conditions. Never had poor health at a real bad time. You must not have capeweed or lush spring growth. My sheep are well adapted to the area. You can't change basic animal behaviour. Fat, lazy or lame ewes lying in long grass peeing or crapping without getting up are real targets for fly strike. My ancestors used Luci-jet & diazinon. It sent them to a early grave! So, what are the names of your pets?
Posted by THE FARMER, 15/07/2009 10:10:35 PM, on Farm Weekly

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW

Irwin Hunter 160x160
 
Banjawarn Station


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...